Relações Públicas e Astroturfing na perspectiva relacional / Public Relations and Astroturfing from a relational perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v12i23.750Keywords:
AstroturfingAbstract
O presente artigo trata sobre o astroturfing, relata casos ocorridos em diversas partes do mundo e tensiona-o com a área das Relações Públicas. Esta é uma pesquisa exploratória de caráter qualitativo, com base teórica na perspectiva relacional da comunicação (SILVA, 2013). A partir de uma pesquisa de estado da arte e bibliográfica embasamos a discussão em Silva (2013), Attkisson (2015), Henriques e Silva (2014; 2021), Simões (1994), Kunsch (2003) e no Conselho Federal, CONFERP. Em linhas gerais, percebem-se aproximações entre as duas áreas, por outro lado, as RRPP estão sustentadas em um código de ética que deve balizar a atuação dos profissionais, consequentemente, conferindo responsabilidade e qualidade às relações estabelecidas no mercado.
Palavras-chave: Astroturfing, relações públicas, perspectiva relacional.
Abstract
The public relations activity is defined as an area of strategic communication which acts on building mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their audiences. Constant social transformations have an impact on the social perception of different themes, which in turn also directly affects the positioning of organizations. In this scenario, we discuss the term “astroturfing” and its similarities and/or differences concerning public relations based on a relational perspective of communication. This article is characterized as an exploratory research based on a bibliographic analysis. The object of study is astroturfing in the context of public relations; therefore, a qualitative approach has been used. We observed that the extreme usage of digital social networks has contributed to numerous scenarios of misinformation which, therefore, end up encouraging deceptive or simulated practices arising from different social institutions. Thus, it is in such a context that the practice of astroturfing can be seen. This practice emerged in the 1980s in the United States during an election campaign in which there were disputes for a favourable public opinion. The term is an analogy to the word “grassroots, that is, how spontaneous popular manifestations are known in the US, and AstroTurf is a brand of artificial grass created by Monsanto in the 1960s, which is famous for its similarity to the appearance of real grass” (Silva, 2013: 14). The phenomenon can be seen as the creation of public manifestations by an audience that does not exist in order to achieve a favourable scenario for organizational objectives. In a practical way, communication processes can act as astroturfing drivers, thus contributing to the emergence of artificial contexts. In this article, we investigate the communication process by reflecting on the importance of the PR professional who looks at the public from a relational perspective. The connection of such a phenomenon with the field of public relations derives from the practices of international agencies that have subtly used astroturfing to achieve the goals of their clients in such a way that organizational ethics committees do not clearly perceive it. This is one of the aspects that leads professionals in the area to question what would or would not be ethical. Public relations, as an expression of strategic communication, has the ability to observe scenarios, mobilize forces and elaborate narratives that enable the construction of an organizational image and reputation. Perhaps an adequate translation of these strategic efforts is to recognize the connections among public relations, its audiences and the public opinion. In this scenario, there are ample information flows from the mediatized context that sometimes can create gaps for the practice of astroturfing. We understand that the phenomenon is consolidated as a contemporary challenge in the market, mainly in communication. Therefore, we highlight on how the ethical dimensions of public relations permeate the purpose of balance and harmony of interests. It is urgent to act, not only for the aesthetics but also for the ethics of the profession, in favour of the strengthening of the subjects and, consequently, the quality of the established social relations.
Keywords: Astroturfing, public relations, Relational perspective.
Downloads
References
ALVES, F. G.; GARDETA, J. M. V.; SOUSA, P. H. da M. R. (2021) El Astroturfing Como Una Estrategia Publicitaria Engañosa Y Abusiva En Las Plataformas De Mercado. Cadernos de Comunicação Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 25 (2), 2-27. https://doi.org/10.5902/2316882X63615.
ANDRADE, C. T. de S. (2001). Para entender relações públicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Loyola.
ATTKISSON, S. (2015). Astroturf and manipulation of media messages. Nevada: Tedx University Of Nevada. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bYAQ-ZZtEU.
CÁDIMA, F. R. (2016). O (des)controle da Internet: bad bots, astroturfing e flogging. Revista Brasileira de História da Mídia, São Paulo, 5 (2), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.26664/issn.2238-5126.5220164781
CONRERP 6ª Região (1985). Código de Ética dos Profissionais de Relações Públicas: princípios fundamentais. Recuperado de: https://www.conrerp6.org.br/relacoes-publicas/.
GIL, A. C. (2008). Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. São Paulo: Atlas.
HENRIQUES, M. S.; SILVA, D. R. (2014). Vulnerabilidade dos públicos frente a práticas abusivas de comunicação empregadas por organizações: limitações para o monitoramento civil. Comunicação e Sociedade, Belo Horizonte, 26 (maio), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.26(2014).2031.
HENRIQUES, M. S. (2017). As organizações e a vida incerta dos públicos. In Marques, A., Oliveira, I. de L., Lima, F. (Coords). Comunicação Organizacional: vertentes conceituais e metodológicas. Vol. 2 (119-129). Belo Horizonte: PPGCOM UFMG.
HENRIQUES, M. S.; SILVA, D. R. (2021). Influência indireta e estratégia: notas sobre o sistema de interinfluências e suas possibilidades para a comunicação organizacional. In ENCONTRO ANUAL DA COMPÓS, 30, São Paulo. Anais [...] (1-21). São Paulo: Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação.
KUNSCH, M. M. K. (2003). Planejamento de Relações Públicas na Comunicação Integrada. São Paulo: Summus.
LANA, L. C. de C. (2008). Gregory Bateson e o processo comunicativo. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, 14 (2), 235-245.
LEVY, C. A. (2022). Máquina oculta de propaganda do iFood. Recuperado em: https://apublica.org/2022/04/a-maquina-oculta-de-propaganda-do-ifood/.
LIPPMANN, W. (1925). The Phantom Public. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
MANUAL SISTEMA CONFERP (2016). Brasília. Recuperado em: http://conferp.org.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pdf_manual_conferp.pdf.
O’CONNELL, S. (2020). The Bizarre World of Astroturfing (And No, Not the Kind On the Football Field). Recuperado em: https://rdi.org/democracy-examined/2020/12/1/the-bizarre-world-of-astroturfing-and-no-not-the-kind-on-the-football-field/.
OLICSHEVIS, G. (2006). Mídia e opinião pública. Revista Vernáculo, Curitiba, 18 (17), 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rv.v1i17/18.20423
PÉRSIGO, P. M.; SCHEID, D.; MACHADO, J. (2019). Diversidade nas organizações: sobre o que, de fato, estamos falando? In: SCHEID, D.; MACHADO, J.; PÉRSIGO, P. M. (org.). Tendências em comunicação organizacional: temas emergentes no contexto das organizações (pp.105-115) Frederico Westphalen: Facos UFSM.
RAMOS, R. (2022). Astroturfing Digital: uma revisão sistemática de literatura. Recuperado em: https://cpop.ufpr.br/astroturfing-digital-uma-revisao-sistematica-de-literatura/.
REZENDE, H. P.; FARIAS, L. A. B. (2014). Astroturfing e suas aplicações na internet. In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DA ABCIBER, 2014, São Paulo. Anais [...] (1-21). São Paulo: Espm.
SILVA, D. R. (2013). O astroturfing como um processo comunicativo: a manifestação de um público simulado, a mobilização de públicos e as lógicas de influência na opinião pública. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Curso de Comunicação Social, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
SIMÕES, R. P. (1994). Relações Públicas Micropolítica. Famecos, 2 (1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1994.1.2659
STUMPF, I. R. C. (2010) Pesquisa bibliográfica. In DUARTE, J.; BARROS, A. (org.). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação. 2 ed. (51-61). São Paulo: Atlas.
TERRA, C. F.; SOUSA, G. M. S. F. (2017). Opinião pública em tempos de mídias sociais: midiatização, comunicação desintermediada e memes. In FARIAS, L. A.; LEMOS, E., REBECHI, C. N. (org.). Opinião pública, comunicação e organizações: convergências e perspectivas contemporâneas. (164-177). São Paulo: Abrapcorp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).