Quo Vadis Communication?
Results of a Survey Among the Next Generation PR/Communications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v13i25.807Keywords:
Public Relations, future of PR, NextGenPR, professionals, future generationsAbstract
This study investigates the perceptions of young PR/Comms professionals in Germany regarding the profession's current and future state, amidst the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the job market. The research builds on previous studies exploring the future of work and the PR industry, aiming to address gaps in literature regarding generational differences in attitudes and a critical reflective approach. The study used a standardized survey and purposeful and snowball sampling methods to select 160 PR practitioners under the age of 36.
The results reveal that the next generation of PR/Communications professionals values intrinsic and idealistic factors when choosing an employer, but those without children pursue a more hedonistic agenda. Respondents perceive themselves as dealing with the ramifications of a VUCA world and consider trust as the most significant challenge within the next five years. The study highlights a significant gap between the societal and internal dimensions of PR/Communications and its actual implementation. The implications of the study suggest a need to address contentious questions surrounding the role and mission of PR/Comms in society, focusing on social impact and social value, and advocating for more collaborative and interdisciplinary approaches in training and learning practices.
Downloads
References
Adi, A. (2019a). PR Memes: Communicators’ Perceptions and Reflections of Their Practice and Role. BledCom 2018 Proceedings, 12-27.
Adi, A. (2019b). PR2025: trends, competences and solutions for the near future of PR/Communications – Results of a Delphi method study. Quadriga University of Applied Science. Retrieved from https://www.quadriga-hochschule.com/app/uploads/2021/03/QHS_PR2025_Adi.pdf
Adi, A., & Stoeckle, T. (2021). Future of Communications and Public Relations (PR). (Re) Imagining the Role, Function and Purpose of the Communication Profession. ESSACHESS-Journal for Communication Studies, 14(1), 7-15.
Adi, A., & Stoeckle, T. (2023). Facilitator, not mouthpiece – the future of PR in wicked times. Global Alliance. Retrieved from https://www.globalalliancepr.org/thoughts/2023/1/31/facilitator-not-mouthpiece-the-future-of-pr-in-wicked-times
Beckers, R., Weinand, L., Golly, M., Schäfer, S., Neitzel, E., Hammerschmidt, M., & Czock, J. (2022). Future Needs der Generation Z. Zerrissen, traditionell und unter immensem Druck. IFH Köln. https://www.ifhkoeln.de/?download_file=87050&order=wc_order_BSYVns6p2Oxdm&uid=f5a8493b244c7dc9c417afc98263b0e5ec6bc4f02f9c14024f6a8099ea689e3f&key=4082dbff-97d4-43be-940e-dd195c1e7d8c
Benecke, D. R., & Verwey, S. (2020). Post Digital Dialogue and Activism in the Public Sphere. In Social Media and Elections in Africa, Volume 2: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 135-151).
Bentele, G. (1994). Zukunftsperspektiven für Public Relations. In G. Schulze-Fürstenow & B. Martini (Eds.), Handbuch PR. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in Wirtschaft, Verbänden, Behörden. Grundlagen & Adressen (pp. 1-14). Luchterhand.
Bentele, G., Großkurth, L., & Seidenglanz, R. (2005). Profession Pressesprecher. Vermessung eines Berufsstandes. Helios Media.
Bentele, G., Seidenglanz, R., & Fechner, R. (2015). Profession Pressesprecher 2015 – Vermessung eines Berufsstandes. Quadriga Media.
Bentele, G., Seidenglanz, R., & Fechner, R. (2018). Kommunikationsmanagement 2018 – Vermessung eines Berufsstandes. Quadriga Media.
Bleile, P. (1999). The Future of PR May Be in Its Debunking. Communication World, Special Issue, 42-44.
Cancel, A. E., Cameron, G. T., Sallot, L. M., & Mitrook, M. A. (1997). It depends: A contingency theory of accommodation in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 31-63.
Cernicova-Buca, M. (2016). Redefining "Public Relations" in the 21st Century. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 9, 3-6.
Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR). (2022). State of the Profession 2022. Public relations: A growing industry, standing still. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from https://cipr.co.uk/CIPR/Our_work/Policy/CIPR_State_of_the_Profession_2019_20.aspx
Ciszek, E. (2018). Queering PR: Directions in theory and research for public relations scholarship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(4), 134-145.
Curtin, P. A., Gallicano, T., & Matthews, K. (2011). Millennials' approaches to ethical decision making: A survey of young public relations agency employees. Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1-22.
Cutlip, S. M., & Allen, H. Center. (1978). Effective Public Relations. Eaglewood Cliffs/NJ.
Dodd, M. (2016). Corporate activism: The new challenge for an age-old question. Institute for Public Relations. Retrieved from https://instituteforpr.org/corporate-activism-new-challenge-age-old-question/.
DiStaso, M. W., Stacks, D. W., & Botan, C. H. (2009). State of public relations education in the United States: 2006 report on a national survey of executives and academics. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 254-269.
Doan, M. A., & Bilowol, J. (2014). Vietnamese public relations practitioners: Perceptions of an emerging field. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 483-491.
Edelman. (2023). 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2023-03/2023%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report%20FINAL.pdf
Euromonitor International. (2021). Engaging Millennials and Generation Z in the Coronavirus Era. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from http://www.euromonitor.com/engaging-millenials-and-generation-z-in-the-coronavirus-era/report.
Fawkes, J., & Tench, R. (2004). Does practitioner resistance to theory jeopardize the future of public relations in the UK?. 11th International PR Research Symposium, 4-6.
FIRST INSIGHT. (2020). The State of Consumer Spending. Gen Z Shoppers Demand Sustainable Retail. First Insight. https://160569.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/160569/1.14.2020%20The%20State%20of%20Consumer%20Spending%20Gen%20Z%20Shoppers%20Demand%20Sustainable%20Retail.pdf
Godoy, M. F. de, & Ribas Filho, D. (2021). Facing the BANI World. International Journal of Nutrology, 14(02), 33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735848.
Grabmeier, S. (2020). BANI versus VUCA: A new acronym to describe the world. Retrieved from https://stephangrabmeier.de/bani-versus-vuca/.
Gregory, A., & Wolf, K. (2018). Global Capabilities Framework for Public Relations and Communication Management Australia. Retrieved from https://katharinawolf.weebly.com/uploads/5/1/4/2/51425225/gcf_australia_finalreport2018.pdf
Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2008). Excellence theory in public relations: Past, present, and future. In Public relations research: European and international perspectives and innovations (pp. 327-347).
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2013). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory & practice. Routledge.
Institute for Public Relations. (2009). Global Public Relations. Retrieved June 20, 2023, from https://instituteforpr.org/global-public-relations/
Jandura, O., & Karnowski, V. (2015). Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants – fruchtbares empirisches Konzept für die Kommunikationswissenschaft oder populärwissenschaftliche Fiktion. Publizistik, 60(1), 63-79.
Klein, H. (2016). Studie: Die Generation Y und deren organisatorische Implikationen. Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden. Retrieved from https://www.oth-aw.de/files/oth-aw/Aktuelles/Veroeffentlichungen/WEN-Diskussionspapier/WEN-DPs-PDF/DP56.pdf.
Knight, W. M., & Sweetser, K. D. (2021). Mind the gap: Understanding public relations competence in the eyes of practitioners and the dominant coalition. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 102037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102037
Mack, O. J., Khare, A., Krämer, A., & Burgartz, T. (2016) (Eds.). Managing in a VUCA World. Springer International.
Meyer, I. (2021). The resurrection of modernistic public relations – a metamodern perspective. ESSACHESS-Journal for Communication Studies, 14(27 (1)), 15-36.
Moscato, D. (2016). The brand behind the activism: Patagonia's DamNation campaign and the evolution of corporate social responsibility. Case Studies in Strategic Communication, 5, 99-116. Retrieved from http://cssc.uscannenberg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/v5art6.pdf.
Neff, B. D. (1990). The Future of Public Relations: A Multi-Disciplinary Analysis. Competitive paper for panel on Planning for uncertain world: Processes and data needed for Change, November 1-4, 1990.
OC&C Strategy Consultants. (2019). Eine Generation ohne Grenzen – Generation Z wird erwachsen. Retrieved from https://www.occstrategy.com/media/1904/eine-generation-ohne-grenzen_.pdf.
Pieczka, M., & L'Etang, J. (2006). Public Relations and the question of professionalism. In J. L'Etang & M. Pieczka (Eds.), Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice (pp. 265-278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plastino, E. (2022). The Purpose Gap. Cognizant’s Center for the Future of Work. Cognizant. https://www.cognizant.com/us/en/whitepapers/documents/the-purpose-gap-codex7086.pdf
Pottharst, B. (2022). Generation, Ungleichheit, Technik. Technikkompetenz im höheren Lebensalter. Springer VS.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. A new way to look at ourselves and our kids. On the Horizon, 5(9), 1-6.
Randstad. (2022). Workmonitor 2022. A New Era in the #howwework revolution. Retrieved from https://rscom-cms1-prod.prd.randstadbluex.com/s3fs-media/rscom/public/2022-04/Randstad_Workmonitor_2022.pdf?__hstc=243245085.3d04dfe6d78b8f118fbecc249dbc537b.1652091947837.1652091947837.1652091947837.1&__hssc=243245085.2.1652091947837&__hsfp=2988592740.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Schnetzler, S. (2019). Junge Deutsche – die Studie. Lebens- und Arbeitswelt der Generation Z & Y. Retrieved from https://simon-schnetzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Highlights-Studie-Junge-Deutsche-2019-GenerationZ-GenerationY-Simon-Schnetzer-Jugendforscher.pdf
Schröder, M. (2018). Der Generationenmythos. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 70, 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-018-0570-6
Seidenglanz, R., & Fechner, R. (2022). Profession Kommunikatorin/Kommunikator. Die Berufsfeldstudie 2021. Quadriga Media.
USC Annenberg Center for Public Relations. (2022). The future of corporate activism. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from https://bit.ly/3u5iNyW.
Wehmeier, S. (2009). Out of the fog and into the future: Directions of public relations, theory building, research, and practice. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 265-282.
Wills, C. M. (2020). Diversity in public relations: The implications of a broad definition for PR practice. Public Relations Journal, 13(3), 1-13.
Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2008). European Communication Monitor 2008. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations – Results and Implications. Euprera/University of Leipzig.
Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Buhmann, A. (2022). European Communication Monitor 2022. Exploring diversity and emphatic leadership, CommTech and consulting in communications. Results of a survey in 43 countries. EUPRERA/EACD.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Adi, Ronny Fechner, Rene Seidenglanz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
