The institutional communication of universities on social networks: a study of activity and engagement during the COVID-19 crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v14i27.860Keywords:
content analysis, COVID-19, digital communication, engagement, universitiesAbstract
Social media are critical tools for providing valuable information in crisis situations. Since the COVID-19 Social media are critical tools for providing valuable information during crisis situations. Health crises, in particular, are exceptional circumstances that intensify social uncertainty on a large scale and trigger negative emotions. Previous health crises, such as SARS (2002), H1N1 (2009), Avian Influenza H7N9 (2013), the Ebola virus (2014), and Zika (2016), have demonstrated that social networks are key in public health strategies to accurately disseminate information. For this reason, the WHO has emphasized the importance of digital communication in persuading the population to adopt measures to prevent the escalation of health crises and control epidemic outbreaks.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, universities have utilized their official accounts on various social platforms to keep their strategic audiences informed. In this context, university social networks are configured as essential tools to foster interaction with their priority audiences. Interactive communication acts as a catalyst that enhances the interest of audiences (Gori et al., 2020) in consuming the content published by these institutions and in maintaining stronger connections with them. The dynamic nature of social media allows universities to promptly address public concerns, disseminate accurate information, and counteract misinformation, thereby playing a crucial role in public health communication strategies.
The main objective of this study is to examine the level of activity and engagement generated by the content published by universities on their official Facebook and Twitter accounts concerning coronavirus-related topics since the COVID-19 outbreak. To achieve this, a content analysis was conducted on the institutional profiles of n=70 international reference universities (in Europe, USA, and Latin America) during the year 2021 to measure the level of interaction generated by these messages and compare them with non-COVID-19 related posts. This analysis seeks to identify patterns and differences in user engagement, providing insights into the effectiveness of university communication strategies during health crises.
The primary results indicate no significant differences between COVID-19 related publications and non-COVID-19 related ones in terms of activity and engagement levels. Specifically, it was found that COVID-19 related content published by universities on their Facebook and Twitter accounts did not generate high levels of activity in any of the three geographical areas analyzed (United States, Europe, and Latin America). This finding suggests that merely addressing pandemic-related topics is insufficient to maintain high levels of audience engagement and that additional factors may influence the effectiveness of these communications.
Therefore, it is suggested to reinforce visual content on Twitter and Facebook to enhance the activity levels of the content published by universities. Long paragraphs can disperse users' attention, especially considering that a significant group of users belong to younger generations accustomed to consuming emoticons, GIFs, short videos, and photographs on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Visual content, such as infographics, videos, and engaging images, can attract more attention and foster higher engagement among users, making the communication more effective.
Additionally, it is recommended that communication professionals in university institutions receive training and specialization in developing effective communication strategies for social networks during crisis situations. To this end, these professionals should learn to integrate actions, measures, and protocols as outlined in the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) framework. This framework provides guidelines for effective communication during crises, emphasizing the need for timely, accurate, and transparent information to maintain public trust and mitigate the impact of the crisis. By implementing these strategies, universities can improve their social media engagement and ensure that their messages reach and resonate with their target audiences, ultimately contributing to better public health outcomes during crises.
Downloads
References
Abitbol, A. & Lee, S. Y. (2017). Messages on CSR-dedicated Facebook pages: What works and what doesn’t. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.002
Atarama-Rojas, T. & Vega-Foelsche, D. (2020). Comunicación corporativa y branded content en Facebook: un estudio de las cuentas oficiales de las universidades peruanas. Revista de Comunicación, 19(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A3
Ballesteros, H.C.A. (2018). El índice de engagement en redes sociales, una medición emergente en la Comunicación académica y organizacional. Razón y Palabra, 29(3), 96–124. https://goo.su/TJsU9VS
Bélanger, C.H., Bali, S. & Longden, B. (2014). How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2013.852237
Brech, F.M., Messer, U., Vander Schee, B.A., Rauschnabel, P.A. & Ivens, B.S. (2017). Engaging fans and the community in social media: interaction with institutions of higher education on Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1219803
Brennan, B. & Gutiérrez, V. (2011). Guía para elaborar la estrategia de comunicación de riesgo. De la teoría a la acción. Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Brubaker, P.J. & Wilson, C. (2018). Let’s give them something to talk about: Global brands’ use of visual content to drive engagement and build relationships. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 342–352.
Budge, K. (2019). Remember Me: Instagram, Selfies and Libraries. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1688507
Capriotti, P. & Zeler, I. (2020). Comparing Facebook as an interactive communication tool for companies in LatAm and worldwide. Communication & Society, 33(3), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.119-136
Capriotti, P., Losada-Díaz, J.C. & MARTÍNEZ-GRAS, R. (2023). Evaluating the content strategy developed by universities on social media. Profesional de la información, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.10
Capriotti, P., Martínez-Gras, R. & Zeler, I. (2023). Does universities' posting strategy influence their social media engagement? An analysis of the top-ranked higher education institutions in different countries. Higher Education Quarterly, 00, 1– 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12439
Capriotti, P., Zeler, I. & Camilleri, M.A. (2021). Corporate Communication Through Social Networks: The Identification of the Key Dimensions for Dialogic Communication. En M.A. Camilleri (ed.), Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 33–51). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211003
Cho, M., Furey, L. & Mohr, T. (2016). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on Social Media: Strategies, Stakeholders, and Public Engagement on Corporate Facebook. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616663708
Coombs, W.T. (2014). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. SAGE
Coombs, W.T. & Holladay, S.J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233
Denecke, K., Bamidis, P., Bond, C., Gabarron, E., Househ, M., Lau, A.Y.S., Mayer, M.A., Merolli, M. & Hansen, M. (2015). Ethical issues of social media usage in healthcare. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 10(1), 137-147. 10.15265/IY-2015-010
Dixon, S. (2023, 13 de septiembre). Average Engagement Rate per Posts on Social Media in 2020 and 2021. Statista. https://goo.su/0C3b0F
Drylie-Carey, L., Sánchez-Castillo, S. & Galán-Cubillo, E. (2020). European leaders unmas-ked: Covid-19 communication strategy through Twitter. El Profesional de la información, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.04
Ebrahim, H. & Seo, H. (2019). Visual Public Relations in Middle Eastern Higher Education: Content Analysis of Twitter Images. Media Watch, 10(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw_2019_v10i1_49563
Eger, L., Egerová, D., Tomczyk, L., Krystoň, M. & Czeglédi, C. (2021). Facebook for Public Relations in the higher education field: a study from four countries Czechia, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(2), 240-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1781737
Eizmendi-Iraola, M. & Peña-Fernández, S. (2023). La visibilidad de las mujeres científicas en la comunicación externa de las universidades a través de las redes sociales. Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar De Estudios De Comunicación Y Ciencias Sociales, (37), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n37a1861
Feehan, B. (2022). 2022 Social Media Industry Benchmark Report. Rival IQ. https://goo.su/z2kA0
Fernández-Luque, L. & Imran, M. (2018). Humanitarian health computing using artificial intelligence and social media: A narrative literature review. International journal of medical informatics, 114, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.015
Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M.P. & Lozano-Blasco, R. (2020). Universidades y comunicación. Papel de Twitter durante el inicio de la crisis sanitaria de la Covid-19. El Profesional de la información, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.12
Gori, E., Romolini, A., Fissi, S. & Contri, M. (2020). Toward the dissemination of sustainability issues through social media in the higher education sector: Evidence from an Italian case. Sustainability, 12(11), 4658-4672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114658
Guidry, J.P.D., Jin, Y., Orr, C.A., Messner, M. & Meganck, S. (2017). Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public relations review, 43(3), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.009
Holmes, B.J. (2008). Communicating about emerging infectious disease: The importance of research. Health, Risk & Society, 10(4), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802166431
IAB Spain (2021). Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales 2021. bit.ly/3JSKS4n
Kemp, S. (2022, 26 de enero). Digital 2022: Global Overview Report. We Are Social & Hootsuite. https://goo.su/njjgT2
Kim, Y., Kim, B., Hwang, H.S. & Lee, D. (2020). Social media and life satisfaction among college students: A moderated mediation model of SNS communication network heterogeneity and social self-efficacy on satisfaction with campus life. The Social Science Journal, 57(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.001
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G. & Woodward, S. (2017). Institutional Uses of Twitter in U.S. Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9375-6
Kwok, L., Mao, Z. & Huang, Y.K. (2019). Consumers’ electronic word-of-mouth behavioral intentions on Facebook: Does message type have an effect? Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358417742684
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Liedke, J. & Matsa, K.E. (2022, 20 de septiembre). Social Media and News Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center. ibit.ly/xAys
Liu, B.F. & Kim, S. (2011). How organizations framed the 2009 H1N1 pandemic via social media and traditional media: Implications for U.S. health communicators. Public relations review, 37(3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.005
Liu, W., Lai, C.H. & Xu, W. (2018). Tweeting about emergency: A semantic network analysis of government organizations’ social media messaging during hurricane Harvey. Public relations review, 44(5), 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.009
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Bracken, C.C. (2002). Content Analysis in Mass Communication. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
López-Pérez, L. & Olvera-Lobo, M.D. (2016). Social media as channels for the public communication of science. The case of Spanish research centers and public universities. En K. Knautz & K.S. Baran (eds.), Facets of Facebook: use and users (pp. 241-264). De Gruyter House.
Losada-Díaz, J.C. & Capriotti, P. (2015). La comunicación de los museos de arte en Facebook: comparación entre las principales instituciones internacionales y españolas. Palabra Clave, 18(3), 889–904. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2015.18.3.11
Losada-Díaz, J.C., Rodríguez Fernández, L. & Paniagua Rojano, F.J. (2020). Comunicación gubernamental y emociones en la crisis del Covid-19 en España. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 23-40. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1467
Marino, V. & Lo Presti, L. (2018). Approaches to university public engagement in the online environment: Insights from Anglo-Saxon higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0215
Martin, M. (2023, 13 de marzo). 29 Twitter Stats That Matter to Marketers in 2023. Hootsuite. ibit.ly/6gPW
Mclachlan, S. (2021). How Often to Post to Social Media in 2021. Hootsuite. https://t.ly/nmrZ6
Méndiz-Noguero, A., Wennberg-Capellades, L., Regadera-González, E. & Goni-Fuste, B. (2023). Public health communication and the Covid-19: A review of the literature during the first wave. El Profesional De La información, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.13
Motta, J. & Barbosa, M. (2018). Social Media as a Marketing Tool for European and North American Universities and Colleges. Journal of Intercultural Management, 10(3), 125-154. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2018-0020
Newberry, C. (2023, 17 de enero). 42 Facebook Statistics Marketers Need to Know in 2023. Hootsuite. ibit.ly/dGwU
Oliveira, A., Capriotti, P. & Zeler, I. (2022). El estado de la cuestión de la investigación sobre la comunicación digital de las universidades. Redmarka, Revista de Marketing Aplicado, 26(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17979/redma.2022.26.2.9240
Oradini, F. & Saunders, G. (2008). The use of social networking by students and staff in higher education. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 156 – 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.316
Organización Mundial De La Salud (2020, 11 de marzo). Alocución de apertura del Director General de la OMS en la rueda de prensa sobre la COVID-19 celebrada el 11 de marzo de 2020. Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://cutt.ly/kwqJejMO
Parks, W. & Lloyd, L. (2004). Planificación de la movilización y comunicación social para la prevención y el control del dengue: guía paso a paso. Organización Mundial de la Salud.
Parmelee, S.D. & Greer, C.F. (2023). Corporate responses to the COVID-19 pandemic by Fortune 500 companies. Public Relations Review, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102285
Pascual-Ferrá, P., Alperstein, N. & Barnett, D.J. (2020). Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Public Discourse on Twitter: Implications for Risk Communication. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 16(2), 561 – 569. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.347
Pérez-Escolar, M., Alcaide-Pulido, P. & Del Toro, A. (2023). Nuevos referentes informativos de la generación Z. Estudio del rol de los y las influencers en TikTok como divulgadores/as de contenidos. Prisma Social, (40), 262-288. https://t.ly/uUfs5
Peruta, A. & Shields, A.B. (2016). Social media in higher education: understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1212451
Pourebrahim, N., Sultana, S., Edwards, J., Gochanour, A. & Mohanty, S. (2019). Understanding communication dynamics on Twitter during natural disasters: A case study of hurricane Sandy. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101176
Rodríguez-Vázquez, C., Teijeiro-Álvarez, M. & Blázquez-Lozano, F. (2018). Evaluation of the fanpages of Spanish universities: Public versus private institutions. Universal access in the information society, 17(4), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0530-3
Soboleva, A., Burton, S., Mallik, G. & Khan, A. (2017). ‘Retweet for a chance to . . .’: an analysis of what triggers consumers to engage in seeded eWOM on Twitter. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(13–14), 1120–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1369142
The Social Media Family (2020). VI Informe del uso de las redes sociales en España. https://bit.ly/2SCtBEA
The Social Media Family (2021). VII Informe del uso de las redes sociales en España. https://bit.ly/3g7Fsmv
Tirkkonen, P. & Luoma-Aho, V. (2011). Online authority communication during an epidemic: a Finnish example. Public relations review, 37(2), 172-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.004
Valerio-Ureña, G., Herrera-Murillo, D. & Madero-Gómez, S. (2020). Analysis of the Presence of Most Best-Ranked Universities on Social Networking Sites. Informatics, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7010009
Vaughan, E. & Tinker, T. (2009). Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 99(S2), S324–S332. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537
Vogels, E.A. & Gelles-Watnick, R. (2023, 24 de abril). Teens and social media: Key findings from Pew Research Center surveys. Pew Research Center. ibit.ly/V0JH
We Are Social & Hootsuite (2021). Digital 2021. bit.ly/3pS9bbF
White, D.S. & Le-Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 9(16). https://t.ly/uvUPR
Wirtz, B.W., Müller, W.M. & Weyerer, J.C. (2021). Digital pandemic response systems: a strategic management framework against Covid-19. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(11-12), 896-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1858316
Wise, K. (2001). Opportunities for public relations research in public health. Public relations review, 27(4), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00102-3
Xifra, J. (2020). Comunicación corporativa, relaciones públicas y gestión del riesgo reputacional en tiempos del Covid-19. El profesional de la información, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.20
Zeler, I., Oliveira, A., & Malaver, S. (2019). La gestión comunicativa de las empresas vitivinícolas de España en las principales redes sociales. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 9(18), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v9i18.617
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 José Carlos Losada, Paul Capriotti, Marta Pérez-Escolar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
