El retorno de la inversión en las relaciones públicas, una revisión bibliográfica / The return on investment in public relations, a bibliographic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v10i20.656Keywords:
relaciones públicas, retorno de la inversión, comunicación, coste de oportunidad, advertising press releases, native advertising, public relations, opportunity costAbstract
La medición económica de las acciones de comunicación representa un área de gran interés para la comunidad académica, pero en la que no se ha conseguido aportar una solución homogénea ni globalmente aceptada. Pese a este contexto ha emergido en la literatura sobre comunicación el concepto conocido como retorno de la inversión (ROI) basado en el rendimiento financiero obtenido por una actividad.
El estudio bibliográfico del retorno de la inversión en la comunicación, y especialmente en las relaciones públicas, señala la dificultad de convertir en dinero el éxito de la actividad de los profesionales de las relaciones públicas. Esta situación ha invitado a introducir variables no financieras para cuantificar el éxito de las acciones de relaciones públicas. Sin embargo, tomando los trabajos previos sobre el tema, se puede afirmar que la evaluación de las acciones de relaciones públicas puede tratarse desde la perspectiva del coste de oportunidad: el coste de la acción realizada respecto el coste de las otras opciones disponibles.
Palabras claves: relaciones públicas, retorno de la inversión, comunicación, coste de oportunidad
Abstract
This research has carried out a systematized bibliographic review to analyze how the return on investment (ROI) in communication, and specifically in public relations, has been theoretically treated.
The financial measurement of communication outcomes represents a topic of great interest for the academic community because organizations need to know the real results of their communication efforts. At the same time, economic measurement turns out to be a variable that can be understood by the management of the organizations and allows them to know where the money is being spent.
However, despite more than forty years of theoretical work, a homogeneous nor globally accepted solution has not yet been achieved.
The bibliographical study of the return on investment in communication, and especially in public relations, shows the difficulty of turning the success of the activity of public relations professionals into money. On the one hand, there is no doubt that the ROI is directly related to financial data; on the other hand, in communication it is usual to introduce non-economic values to evaluate the results achieved. The bibliographical results indicate in the first instance that, on a quantitative level, the economic aspect is predominant in the calculation of the ROI (96.3%).
In this context measurement by equivalence in advertising (AVE) is an economic model as used by professionals as it is rejected by researchers. It is based on comparing the cost of a presence in the media with the equivalent cost if it were advertising. Nevertheless, this model is criticized for the differences between advertising (a completely controlled message) and publicity (a message that is altered by the media).
However, taking the previous works about the subject, it can be said that the evaluation of public relations actions can be dealt with from the perspective of opportunity cost: the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
In this way, the evaluation of the cost of a traditional advertising action can be compared with the cost of other options available to public relations professionals. For example, native advertising is a resource of public relations teams whose cost can easily be compared to traditional advertising. Native advertising is a paid promotion that matches the audience's consumption and contains information of interest to the advertiser.
Hence opinions that reject the advertising equivalence measurement (AVE) are not justified when the product generated by public relations has the characteristics of native advertising because in both cases (advertising vs. native advertising) the professional can exactly compare the investment made with one instead of the other.
Keywords: advertising press releases, native advertising, public relations, opportunity cost
Downloads
References
AMBLER, T. y ROBERTS, J.H. (2008) Assessing marketing performance: don’t settle for a silver metric. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(7/8), pp. 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708x345498.
ANDRADE, C. T. D. S. (1993). Para entender relações públicas. São Paulo: Ediçoes Loyola.
ARCEO VACAS, J. L. (2007). Debates electorales televisados: el caso de Madrid, 2003. Oleiros. Netbiblo.
AUSTIN, E. W. y PINKLETON, B. E. (2006). Strategic public relations management: Planning and managing effective communication campaigns. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
BLACK, S. (1971). The role of public relations in management. Londres, Reino Unido: Pitman.
BONILLA, C. (2013). Evolución de las relaciones públicas en los últimos 25 años. Razón y Palabra, 18(83). Consultado el 13 de diciembre de 2020 en: https://bit.ly/344Prna.
BUHMANN, A., MACNAMARA, J., y ZERFASS, A. (2019). Reviewing the ‘march to standards’ in public relations: A comparative analysis of four seminal measurement and evaluation initiatives. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101825.
CAPOZZI, L. y BERLIN ZIPFEL, L. (2012). The conversation age: the opportunity for public relations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(3), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281211253566.
CASTILLO ESPARCIA, A. (2010). Introducción a las relaciones públicas. Instituto de Investigación en Relaciones Públicas (IIRP), España. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 em https://bit.ly/2MEVwwb.
CASTILLO-ESPARCIA, A. y VILLABONA-BELTRÁN, D. (2018). Evaluación para demostrar la efectividad en comunicación y relaciones públicas. Una mirada a las prácticas profesionales desde los Communication Monitor. Communication papers, 7(15), 137. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v7i15.22188.
CODINA, L. (2018). Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: procedimientos generales y Framework para ciencias humanas y sociales. Barcelona: Máster Universitario en Comunicación Social. Departamento de comunicación. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2wpeYWH.
COOK, W. A. y TALLURI, V. S. (2004). How the pursuit of ROMI is changing marketing management. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(3), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021849904040322.
DÍAZ, B. G. (2000). El coste de oportunidad como herramienta empresarial. Oviedo: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Oviedo. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en https://bit.ly/2klxv49.
DRURY, C. M. (2013). Management and cost accounting. Berlin, Alemania: Springer.
EHLING, W. (1992), “Estimating the value of public relations and communication to an organization”. En Grunig, J. (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication (pp. 617–38). Management. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
FERRARI, M. A. (2009). Relações Públicas: razões para praticá-las. Organicom, 6(10-11), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2009.139016.
FLAMHOLTZ, E. G. (2012). Human resource accounting: Advances in concepts, methods and applications. Berlin, Alemania: Springer Verlag.
FONTBONA, J. C. (2012). Las auditorías de relaciones públicas (Vol. 21). Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
FONTBONA, J. C. y MATILLA, K. (2014). Medición de las relaciones públicas mediante modelos, indicadores y técnicas: un estudio vertical. En Cambio social y relaciones públicas (pp. 21-46). Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/3oNOUOt.
FORTES, W. G. (2003). Relações públicas. Sao Paulo: Summus Editorial.
FRIEDLOB, G. T. y PLEWA Jr, F. J. (1996). Understanding return on investment. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons
FRIESWICK, K. (2001). New Brand Day. CFO. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 em https://bit.ly/2lUqIyG.
GOODWIN, E. (2017). Public Relations: The Missing Piece of the Puzzle the PR Value Debate. Journal of Promotional Communications, 5(1). Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en https://bit.ly/2kQXuRd.
GREGORY, A. y WATSON, T. (2008). Defining the gap between research and practice in public relations programme evaluation–towards a new research agenda. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(5), 337-350.
GRUNIG, J. E. (2013). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
GRUNIG, L.A., GRUNIG, J.E. y DOZIER, D.M. (2002), Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries. Mahwah,: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606617.
GUIRAO-GORIS, J. A., Olmedo Salas, A. y Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista iberoamericana de enfermería comunitaria, 1(1), 1-25. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2lRDIFt.
HANSSENS, D. M. y DEKIMPE, M. G. (2008). Models for the financial-performance effects of marketing. En Handbook of marketing decision models (pp. 501-523). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56941-3_4.
HOFFMAN, D. L. y FODOR, M. (2010). Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(1), 41. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2mmHaId.
JEFFERY, M. (2010). Data-driven marketing: the 15 metrics everyone in marketing should know. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119198666.
JEFFRIES-FOX, B. (2003). A discussion of advertising value equivalency (AVE). Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation, Institute for Public Relations. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2lVAj8D.
LAL, B., ISMAGILOVA, E., DWIVEDI, Y. K. y KWAYU, S. (2020). Return on Investment in Social Media Marketing: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Digital and Social Media Marketing (pp. 3-17). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24374-6_1.
LIKELY, F. (Marzo de 2012). Principles for the use of return on investment (ROI), Benefit-cost ration (BCR) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) financial metrics in a public relations/communication (PR/C) department. En 15th International Public Relations Research Conference. Congreso llevado a cabo en Miami, Estados Unidos. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2moHuq2.
LIKELY, F., ROCKLAND, D. y WEINER, M. (2006). Perspectives on the ROI of media relations publicity efforts. The Institute of Public Relations. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2m3kzjD.
LIKELY, F. y WATSON, T. (2013). Measuring the Edifice: Public Relations Measurement and Evaluation Practices Over the Course of 40 Years. En K. Sriramesh , A. Zerfass y J. Kim (eds.), Public relations and communication management (pp. 183-202). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
MACNAMARA, J. (2006). Advertising values to measure PR: Why they are invalid. AMEC. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2xSZfPR.
MACNAMARA, J. (2011). PR metrics: How to measure public relations and corporate communication. AMEC. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2m2hSPm
MACNAMARA, J. (2014). Emerging international standards for measurement and evaluation of public relations: A critical analysis. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x14521199.
MACNAMARA, J. (2015). Breaking the measurement and evaluation deadlock: A new approach and model. Journal of communication management, 19(4), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-04-7-0020.
MACNAMARA, J. y GREGORY, A. (2018). Expanding evaluation to progress strategic communication: Beyond message tracking to open listening. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 469-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1450255.
MACNAMARA, J., LWIN, M., Adi, A. y ZERFASS, A. (2016). ‘PESO’media strategy shifts to ‘SOEP’: Opportunities and ethical dilemmas. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 377-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.001.
MAGOUTAS, A., CHOUNTALAS, P. y ZAGKA, A. (2019) An empirical study on measuring the economic value of public relations initiatives. MIBES Transactions, 13(1). Consultado el 13 de diciembre de 2020 en https://bit.ly/3a4NhHV.
MARKLEIN, T. y PAINE, K. (Junio de 2012) The march to standards. En 4th European Summit on Measurement. Congreso llevado a cabo en Dublin, Irlanda. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2krE1X7.
MENG, J. y BERGER, B. K. (2012). Measuring return on investment (ROI) of organizations’ internal communication efforts. Journal of Communication Management, 16(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211278987.
ORDUÑA, O. I. R. (2008). Relaciones públicas: la eficacia de la influencia. Madrid: ESIC Editorial.
PALENCIA-LEFLER, M. (2008). 90 técnicas de relaciones públicas: Manual de comunicación corporativa. Barcelona: Profit Editorial.
SHAFFER, J. (2004). Four steps to demonstrating communication ROI. Communication World On-Line. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2kwzt1K.
SINICKAS, A. (2004). Top Tip: Calculating ROI. Internal Communication Measurement Manual, 138-141. Consultado el 13 de diciembre de 2020 en: https://bit.ly/2JZ4w2Q.
SMITH, B. G. (2008). Representing PR in the marketing mix: A study on public relations variables in marketing mix modeling. Institute for Public Relations, 1-35. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2kupSIL.
SRIVASTAVA, RAJENDRA K. y DAVID J. REIBSTEIN. (2005) Metrics for Linking Marketing to Financial Performance. Cambridge, Mass: Marketing Science Institute, Special Report No. 05-200e. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2kWn1bw.
STACKS, D.W. y MICHAELSON, D. (2010), A Practitioner’s Guide to Public Relations Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Business Experts Press.
STEWART, D. W. y GUGEL, C. T. (Eds.) (2016) Accountable marketing: Linking marketing actions to financial performance. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
SUÁREZ, M. M. y ESTEVEZ, M. (2016). Calculation of marketing ROI in marketing mix models, from ROMI, to marketing-created value for shareholders, EVAM. Universia business review, (52), 18-75. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 em: https://bit.ly/2mlYTzr.
SWEETSER, K. D., AHN, S. J., GOLAN, G. J. y HOCHMAN, A. (2016). Native advertising as a new public relations tactic. American behavioral scientist, 60(12), 1442-1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216660138.
TAYLOR, C. R. (2010). Measuring return on investment from advertising:‘holy grail’or necessary tool?. International Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504871020121X.
VOLK, S. C. y BUHMANN, A. (2019). New avenues in communication evaluation and measurement (E&M): towards a research agenda for the 2020s. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-08-2019-147.
WATSON, T. (2005). ROI or evidence-based PR: The language of public relations evaluation. PRism, 3(1), 1-10. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 em https://bit.ly/2mqDwx5.
WATSON, T. (2011). An initial investigation on the use of ‘Return on Investment” in public relations practice. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.001.
WATSON, T. y ZERFASS, A. (2011). Return on Investment in Public Relations: A critique of concepts used by practitioners from the perspectives of communication and management sciences. PRism, 8, 1-14. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2lXFCV5.
WATSON, T. y ZERFASS, Z. (Marzo de 2012). ROI and PR evaluation: Avoiding ‘smoke and mirrors’. En International Public Relations Research Conference. Congreso llevado a cabo en Miami, Estados Unidos. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2lBPi7D.
WATSON, T. (Marzo de 2012a). Advertising value equivalence–PR’s illegitimate offspring. En International Public Relations Research Conference. Congreso llevado a cabo en Miami, Estados Unidos. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en https://bit.ly/2n86KRN.
WATSON, T. (2012b). The evolution of public relations measurement and evaluation. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.018.
WATSON, T. (2013). Advertising value equivalence—PR's orphan metric. Public Relations Review, 39(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.11.001.
WATSON, T. y NOBLE, P. (2014a). Evaluating public relations: A guide to planning, research and measurement. Kogan Page Publishers
WATSON, T. y NOBLE, P. (2014b). The evolution of evaluation. Communication Director, (3), 44-47. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2lAV8X0.
WEBSTER, J. y WATSON, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, 26(2) xiii-xxiii. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2LRyRPw.
WEINER, M. y BARTHOLOMEW, D. (2006). Dispelling the myth of PR multipliers and other inflationary audience measures. Gainesville, EstadosUnidos: Institute for Public Relations. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2019 en: https://bit.ly/2mCguna.
WILCOX, D. L., CAMERON, G. T., AULT, P. y AGEE, W. (2012). Public Relations Strategies and Tactics, Study Edition. Boston: Pearson.
WOJDYNSKI, B. W. y EVANS, N. J. (2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1115380.
XIFRA, J. (2008). Las relaciones públicas. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
XIFRA, J. Y BOSCH, F. L. (2009). Casos de relaciones públicas y comunicación corporativa. Pearson Educación. Consultado el 13 de diciembre de 2020 en: https://bit.ly/2K3up1k.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
