The communication director “dircom” at first rate private universities in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v13i25.811Keywords:
insttitutionalization, power of decision, professionalization, director of communication, Latin AmericaAbstract
From a systemic approach and with the theory of the new institutionalism, this study characterizes the directors of communication "dircom" or those who exercise their functions in accredited and/or high-quality private universities in Latin America, with the aim of knowing the role of this professional in the institutions, their place in the organizational structure, the aspects related to the institutionalization of their role and the identification of the main challenges they face to achieve legitimacy.
This deductive investigation was carried out with the application of a quantitative questionnaire resolved by 67.3% (n=137) of the sample obtained, taking into account the availability and web accessibility of the contact details of the dircom of private and/or high-quality universities referenced in the different quality assessment systems of the education ministries of each country and, for those countries that do not have similar systems, through the latest lists issued by specific rankings of a nature regional and international.
The study and empirical research on the dircom make sense, due to the potential that this professional has in generating meaning, due to the impact of managing their relationships with the different institutional publics and due to their degree of power and influence in the decision-making bodies of the organization. The relevance of this work is also based on the literature review of this research, since the results show the need for empirical studies on professionals who lead communication processes in Higher Education Institutions in Latin America to learn about their professional development and their realities.
According to the results obtained, the dircom role is not institutionalized in the universities, since it is still a more operational figure than a decision-maker and, depending on their level of studies and years of experience in the area, they have more possibilities of achieving legitimacy. In addition to the classic communication processes, professionals are also increasingly in charge of other areas such as event organization, public relations and marketing.
Although there is a hierarchical recognition of the dircom in the HEIs, given by occupying management, leadership or communication direction positions, there is also a lack of standardization of nominative aspects of the role of the professional in the different institutions, finding substantial differences in countries such as Brazil and Mexico.
The limitations of the study were mainly due to the lack of access, availability and updating of the dircom contact details on the websites of the University of the study, for this reason, of approximately 400 universities referred as accredited or high quality in Latin America, 202 data were obtained for the sample.
This study does not generalize the characterization processes of the dircom in all HEIs in Latin America due to the diversity in the type of existing Universities (public, private, mixed), since they have differences in their forms of management, their decision-making possibilities in budgetary issues, their hierarchical structures, among others. It is also identified that professionals who manage communications in institutions must promote or improve their associative processes to contribute to the standardization of their role and hierarchical place, as well as the promotion of studies that help to better understand their role.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-Nobell, A., Molleda, J., & Silveira, A. (2022). Strategic topics and main professional trends in public relations: Results from 19 Latin American countries. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X221081178
Álvarez-Nobell, A., Molleda, J., Moreno, Á., Athaydes, A., Suárez-Monsalve, A., & Herrera, M. (2021). Comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en América Latina: crisis del COVID 19 en la gestión de comunicación, ciberseguridad, situación de las mujeres, retos éticos y nuevas competencias. Resultados de una encuesta en 20 países. EUPRERA - European Public Relations Education and Research. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=881826
Andersson, R. (2020). Being a ‘strategist’: Communication practitioners, strategic work, and power effects of the strategy discourse. Public Relations Inquiry, 9(3), 257–. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20920819
Arzuaga-Williams, M. (2019). Perspectivas latinoamericanas sobre el rol de los profesionales de la comunicación organizacional y las relaciones públicas. Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación, 17(34), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v17n34a7 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7019424
Barrero, A. E., & Palacios, J. A. (2015). Reflexiones sobre el papel del comunicador social y competencias del comunicador en las organizaciones. Poliantea, 11(20), 197-221. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5251679
Berger, B. (2005). Power over, power with, and power to relations: critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research, XVI(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1701_3
Berger, B. K., Reber, B. H., & Heyman, W. C. (2007). You can’t homogenize success in communication management: PR leaders take diverse paths to top. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285301
Berger, B., & Reber, B. (2006). Gaining influence in public relations: The role of resistance in practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.05.020
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966/2010). A Construção social da realidade. Um livro sobre a sociologia do conhecimento (3ra ed.). Dinalivro. https://cristianorodriguesdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/bergerluckman.pdf
Blumer, H. (1969). El interaccionismo simbólico: perspectiva y método. HORA S.A. Editora. http://data.over-blog-kiwi.com/1/38/03/91/20190327/ob_fae56e_blumer-interaccionismo-simbolico-pe.pdf
Busto S., L. (2017). El papel de los departamentos de comunicación en el sector sanitario español: una comparativa entre Castilla y León y Galicia. Trípodos(40), 133-159. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Tripodos/article/view/335054/425733
Casado M., A. M., Méndiz N., A., & Peláez S., J. I. (2013). The evolution of Dircom: from communication manager to reputation strategist. Communication & Society, 21(1), 47-66. https://www.academia.edu/7250797/The_evolution_of_Dircom_from_communication_manager_to_reputation_strategist
Dozier, D. (1984). Program evaluation and roles of practitioners. Public Relations Review, 10(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(84)80002-8
Dozier, D., & Broom, G. (1995). Evolution of the manager role in public relations practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0701_02
Euprera (s.f.). Latin American Communication Monitor LCM. Obtenido de https://latincommunicationmonitor.com/
Figueiredo, T., & de Sá, S. (2021). O papel da assessoria de comunicação na mediatização da imagem pública e institucional: estudo de caso do Ministério da Saúde Português em situação de pandemia. Revista Estudos em Comunicação(32), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.25768/21.04.03.32.09
González O., C., & Monleón L., P. (2013). La gestión de intangibles en la Dirección de Comunicación Corporativa. Estudio sobre el DirCom en las organizaciones de Reino Unido. Doxa Comunicación(17), 27-56. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4598240
Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., & Ferrari, M. A. (2015). Prospects for Public Relations: Excellence Study results for communication in organizations. Mediterranean Journal of Comunication, 6(2), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2015.6.2.01
Grunig, J., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Grunig/publication/322802009_Managing_Public_Relations/links/5a70b327a6fdcc33daa9dfad/Managing-Public-Relations.pdf
Grunig, J., Dozier, D., Ehling, W., Grunig, L., White, J., Sriramesh, K., & Buffington, J. (1992). Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. https://www.routledge.com/Excellence-in-Public-Relations-and-Communication-Management/Grunig/p/book/9780805802276
Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
Hiscock, R. (2019). Paradigm lost? A historical review of the application of systems theory to public relations since 1975. Public Relations Inquiry, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X19872239
Invernizzi, E., Murtarelli, G., & Romenti, S. (2014). CCOs’ Strategic role in large italian companies. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 4(8), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-8-2014-11-201-220
Luhmann, N. (2005). Poder. Anthropos.
Manucci, M. (2004). Las organizaciones redefinen su futuro. Chasqui Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i88.286
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1983). New institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734-749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
Martín-Barbero, J. (2005). Los oficios del comunicador. Co-herencia, 2(2), 115-143. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/774/77420206.pdf
Matilla, K., Cuenca-Fontbonab, J., & Compte-Pujol, M. (2017). An analysis of the university curricula of Spanish “dircoms” from a public relations approach. Public Relations Review(43), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.003
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1973). De máquinas y seres vivos: una teoría sobre la organización biológica. Editorial Universitaria. https://monoskop.org/images/f/f7/Maturana_Humberto_R_Varela_Francisco_J_De_maquinas_y_seres_vivos_4th_ed_1998.pdf
Moing-Maas, É., & Domenget, J.-C. (2019). Professionnalisation des dircoms: un modèle qui passe par l’atypie. Communication & Professionnalisation(7), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.14428/rcompro.v0i7.1093
Moreno, Á., Molleda, J., Álvarez Nobell, A., Herrera, M., Athaydes, A., & Suárez, A. M. (2019). Comunicación estratégica y sus retos: fake news, confianza, información para la toma de decisiones, liderazgo y compromiso laboral. Resultados de una encuesta en 19 países. EUPRERA - European Public Relations Education and Research. https://www.ufsm.br/app/uploads/sites/813/2020/07/LCM-2018-2019.pdf
Moss, D., Warnaby, G., & Newman, A. (2000). Public Relations practitioner role enactment at the senior management level within UK companies. Journal of Public, 277-307. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_1
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power. The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/joe_nye_wielding_soft_power.pdf
Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft power: the evolution of a concept. Journal of political power, 14(1), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879572
Parsons, T. (1951/2005). The social system (2ª ed.). Routledge Sociology Classics.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: lessons from america's best-run companies. Harper Collins.
Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. The University of Chicago. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/uchi051/91009999.html
Sandhu, S. (2009). Strategic communication: an institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180902805429
Sebastião, S. (2021a). Comunicação estratégica na relação com os media. ISCSP - Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.
Sebastião, S. (2021b). Confiança e transparência na profissão e nos profissionais de comunicação estratégica. Estudos em Comunicação(32), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.25768/21.04.03.32.02
Sebastião, S., & Spínola, S. C. (2021). Perceções sobre a provedoria de informação aos decisores e as funções de comunicação estratégica em Portugal: resultados do European Communication Monitor 2018. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 15(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS15120211567
Simão, J., & da Silva, N. (2013). Da integração à legitimação: valores e públicos em relações públicas. Comunicação Pública, 8(13), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.4000/cp.489
Tam, L., Kim, J.-N., Grunig, J., Hall, J., & Swerling, J. (2022). In search of communication excellence: Public relations’ value, empowerment, and structure in strategic management. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2020.1851286
Tench, R., Verhoeven, P., & Zerfass, A. (2009). Institutionalizing strategic communication in Europe – An ideal home or a mad house? Evidence from a survey in 37 countries. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180902806237
Verčič, D. (2008). Public relations and power: how hard is soft power? En A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh, Public Relations Research (págs. 271-279). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_17 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_17
Villafañe, J. (1999). La gestión profesional de la imagen corporativa. Pirámide.
Villafañe, J. (2004). La buena reputación. Claves del valor intangible de las empresas. Ediciones Pirámide.
Viñarás A., M., Gonzálvez V., J. E., & Rincón, S. (2020). La comunicación interpersonal y la comunicación interna en las empresas: un análisis desde la profesión y la universidad. Comunicación y Hombre, 16, 335-354.
Weber, M. (1922/2002). Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva (4ª ed.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Wiener, N. (1958/1988). Cibernética y sociedad (3ra ed.). Editorial Sudamericana.
Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2013). European Communication Monitor 2013. A changing landscape – Managing crises, digital communication and CEO positioning in europe. Results of a survey in 43 countries. EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 BORIS ORLANDO HERNANDEZ BERNAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
