When human rights are out of the game: an analysis of the silencing of national teams during the 2022 World Cup
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v13i26.821Keywords:
Organizational communication, Invisibility strategies, Social media, Human Rights, World CupAbstract
The 2022 Football World Cup, hosted in Qatar, brought together 32 national teams represented by the respective national football federations. This study considered these teams as organizations and their capacity to inform and shape public perception according to their communication strategies through messages on their social networks. Such a major sport event provides, in addition to the competitive experience, a unique opportunity to give visibility to social responsibility and human rights issues. This study focuses precisely on the relationship between the visibility and the dimension granted by these selections to human rights violations associated with the host country of Qatar. For this purpose, the analysis of their digital presence on Facebook, the platform that concentrates the largest number of followers of these federations, is considered. The theoretical basis of this study addresses concepts such as the Spiral of Silence, Public Opinion, Invisibility Strategies, Silencing of Organizations, Agenda-setting, and Framing, which contribute to the understanding of how communications can impact and influence public opinion in raising awareness about issues related to social responsibility, human rights and their representation in the public space. This investigation, characterized by being quantitative and qualitative, is assumed to be a multiple case study and adopts a methodological approach with the content analysis technique. We consider a sample of 5,069 publications extracted from the official Facebook accounts of each one of the national teams participating in the Football World Cup. For the investigation, the period of the event was considered, from November 18, 2022, to December 21, 2022, to which were added, for analysis purposes, two days before the official opening and two days after the final. When analyzing each of these publications, we mainly tried to verify the correspondence of these messages with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the UN's 2030 Agenda, which are used in this study as a reference for the presence of social responsibility content, deepening the analysis for the recurrence of messages that warn of human rights violations committed by the host country of the World Cup, Qatar. The results indicate that although some of the national teams addressed issues related to the Sustainable Development Goals, only 3 of the 32 national teams mentioned, even superficially, the human rights concerns associated with hosting the World Cup. This flagrant discrepancy between the recognition of these social issues and the visibility conferred by the official communication of these organizations through their digital platforms constitutes the central point of the results. The implications of these findings reveal a gap between recognizing controversial issues and communicating about them. The study highlights the need for sports organizations to adopt a more consistent and responsible approach to controversial issues, considering that the potential impact of their messages can shape public opinion. In this way, we seek to contribute to academic discussions that mainly involve the invisibility strategies of organizations in the face of communicating critical issues. A competition of the magnitude of the 2022 World Cup provides not only a stage for sports performances but the opportunity to draw attention to matters of public interest that can be debated and reflected on through the dissemination capacity of digital social networks.
Downloads
References
Coelho, J. P. (2022). A Copa no Catar: o ápice de um projeto de Estado para melhorar a imagem do país. Revista Avesso: Pensamento, Memória e Sociedade, 3(2), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.23925/2675-8253.2022v3n2A3
Cohen, B. C. (1963). Press and foreign policy: princeton university press.
Coller, X. (2000). Estudio de casos (Vol. 30): Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas Madrid.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2017). The sustainable development goals (SDGs). In The value for Europe. Whitepaper.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience: Harvard University Press.
Gradim, A. (2016). Framing, o enquadramento das notícias. Lisboa.
Hulme, D. (2007). The making of the millennium development goals: human development meets results-based management in an imperfect world. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper(16).
Hulme, M. (2010). Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 558-564.
Janis, I. L. (1982). O problema da validação da análise de conteúdo. In A linguagem da política. Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Vol. 2). California: Sage publications.
Marques Dos Santos, P., Antunes, S., & Guedes, A. (2019). Os objetivos do milénio–os resultados de 2015 e prospetiva para 2030. Paper presented at the I Congresso Global de Direitos Humanos.
Marques, M. A., & Macedo, J. F. (2023). A Copa do Mundo FIFA (2022) como estratégia de consolidação de uma imagem: o contraditório caso do Catar. Pegada - A Revista da Geografia do Trabalho, 24(1), 451-471. doi:https://doi.org/10.33026/peg.v24i1.9698
McCombs, M. (2009). A teoria da agenda: a mídia e a opinião pública. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Mendonça, R. F., & Braga, C. F. (2015). A Espiral do Silêncio e as Representações Sociais: Os Meios de Comunicação, a Legitimação e a Naturalização. Paper presented at the Apresentado no GP Teorias da Comunicação do XV Encontro dos Grupos de Pesquisa em Comunicação, evento componente do XXXVIII Congresso Brasileiro de Ciências da Comunicação.
Mibielli, P., & Barcellos, F. C. (2014). Os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento do Milênio (ODMs)-: uma avaliação crítica. Histórias, histórias, 5(3), 222-244.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Moura-Paula, M. J. d. (2014). Silêncio nas organizações: uma revisão e discussão da literatura. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 15, 15-44.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). La espiral del silencio. La opinión pública y los efectos de los medios de comunicación. Communication Society, 6(1-2), 9-28.
Okado, G. H. C., & Quinelli, L. (2016). Megatendências Mundiais 2030 e os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS): uma reflexão preliminar sobre a" Nova Agenda" das Nações Unidas. Revista Baru-Revista Brasileira de Assuntos Regionais e Urbanos, 2(2), 111-129.
Pedersen, P. M., Laucella, P., Geurin, A., & Kian, E. (2007). Strategic sport communication: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Pérez-Seoane, J., Corbacho-Valencia, J. M., & Albuín-Penas, J. (2023). Qatar World Cup: own goal or success for sponsors. Analysis of videos posted on YouTube and audience response. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social(81), 76-96. doi:https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-2006
Rocha, C. M. d., & Bastos, F. d. C. (2011). Gestão do esporte: definindo a área. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 25(SPE), 91-103.
Rocha, F. J. d., & Morais, R. (2021). O papel do futebol no combate às desigualdades e na afirmação do papel da mulher: uma análise das estratégias de comunicação dos clubes de Portugal e Brasil no Dia Internacional da Mulher. Interações: Sociedade e as Novas Modernidades, 41, 68-93. doi:10.31211/interacoes.41.2021.a4
Rosen, S., & Tesser, A. (1970). On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry, 253-263.
Ruão, T., & Salgado, P. J. C. F. (2008). Comunicação, imagem e reputação em organizações desportivas: Um estudo exploratório. Comunicação e Cidadania, 328-340.
Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., & Lafortune, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019: Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Samuel-Azran, T., Hayat, T., & Galily, Y. (2023). Global Sport Protest Activism Is Exclusive to the Global Elite: A Case Study of# boycottqatar2022. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(10), 1179-1193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118299
Savenhago, I., & Pistori, W. (2017). Onze: futebol e ciências humanas: Paco Editorial.
Scheufle, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International journal of public opinion research, 12(1), 3-28.
Silva, D. W. S. d. (2018). Comunicação organizacional e as estratégias de invisibilidade e de redução/direcionamento da visibilidade nas mídias sociais. UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
Silva, D. W. S. d., & Baldissera, R. (2019). Comunicação organizacional e as estratégias de invisibilidade e de redução/direcionamento da visibilidade nas mídias sociais. Organicom. doi:https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2019.163239
Sousa, J. P. (2008). A teoria do agendamento e as responsabilidades do jornalista ambiental: uma perspectiva ibérica. Biblioteca on-line de Ciências da Comunicação, 1.
Temer, A. C. R. P., & Nery, V. C. A. (2009). Para entender as teorias da comunicação. Uberlândia, 2 ed.
Thaker, H. M. T., Sakti, M. R. P., Qoyum, A., Thaker, M. A. M. T., & Hosen, M. (2023). Recent SDGs and ESG Implementation by Qatar. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy Management, 25(03), 2350017. doi:10.1142/S1464333223500175
Weaver, D. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest: Greenwood.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Jesus da Rocha, Ricardo Morais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).