CCOs’ Strategic Role in Large Italian Companies / El papel del Dircom en las grandes organizaciones italianas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v4i8.295Keywords:
Public RelationsAbstract
This study explores the extant state of art of Public Relations and Corporate Communication as profession in Italy. More specifically it aims to evaluate to what extent large organizations in Italy attribute strategic value to the function of communication, with a particular focus on the degree of its institutionalization and the strategic contribution provided by Italian CCOs to organizational competitiveness and success. To this end, an inquiry was conducted via a quantitative survey that addressed and outlined Communication department features and CCOs’ profile in 300 largest organizations operating in Italy.
According to our findings, PR function has established itself within organizational structure, and Italian CCOs have become increasingly involved in strategic organizational decision processes. In their role CCOs serve as strategic advisors to CEOs and other Chief Officers.
Additionally, within the most innovative organizations, communication seems to play an extremely pivotal role and is exemplified by CCOs’ high level of involvement in decision-making process.
Our study allows us to outline a precise description of current trends within large organizations in Italy in terms of communication function and its role. Thereby the study underlines weaknesses and strengths of Italian CCOs’ role as well as it pinpoints areas that need improvement. Furthermore this study enriches the stream of research concerning institutionalization of PR and strategic communication as well as it provides practitioners and scholars with precise insights into the strategic role of communication and its link with innovation.
Downloads
References
ALVAREZ, S., Barney, J. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 621-635.
BEURER-ZUELLIG, B., Fieseler, C. y Meckel M. (2009). A descriptive inquiry into the corporate communication profession in Europe. Public Relations Review, 3(35), 270-279.
COVIN, J.G., Slevin, D.P. (1986). The development and testing of an organization-level entrepreneurship scale in Ronstant, R., Peterson, R., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1986. Babson College: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference.
COVIN, J.G. (1989), Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
DAFT, R.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
ETTLIE, J.E., O'Keefe, R.D. (1982). Innovative Attitudes, Values, And Intentions in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 163-182.
FABRIGAR, L.R. et al. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods, 3(4), 272.
HALLAHAN, K. et al. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3-35.
INVERNIZZI, E., Romenti, S. (2011). Adopting an entrepreneurial perspective to the study of strategic communication. Paper presented at the International Communication Association (ICA) Pre-Conference on Strategic Communication, Boston.
INVERNIZZI, E., Romenti, S. (2013). Adopting an Entrepreneurial Perspective to the Study of Strategic Communication, in Holtzhausen, D., Zerfass, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication, London: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
LURATI, F., Eppler, M. (2006). Communication and management: researching corporate communication and knowledge communication in organizational settings. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2(6), 75-98.
MORENO, À. et al. (2010). European Communication Monitor 2009. An institutionalized view of how communication management professionals face the economic and media crises in Europe. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 97-104.
MORENO, À. et al. (2009). European Communication Monitor: current developments, issues and tendencies of the professional practice of public relations in Europe. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 79-82.
ÖZSOMER, A., Calantone R.J., Di Bonetto A. (1997). What makes firms more innovative? A look at organizational and environmental factors. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 12(6), 400-416.
ROMENTI, S. et al. (2013). Communication: a strategic lever for innovative organizations. Paper presented at the XXV Sinergie Conference, 24-25 October, Ancona.
SRIRAMESH, K., Vercic, D. (2009). The global public relations handbook. Theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
STEVENSON, H.H., Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5),17-27.
TENCH, R., Verhoeven, P., Zerfass, A. (2009). Institutionalizing strategic communication in Europe – An ideal home or a mad house? Evidence from survey in 37 Countries. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 147-164.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Valentini, C. (2010). Personalized Networks of Influence in Public Relations: Strategic results for achieving Successful Professional Outcomes. Journal of Communication Management, 2(14), 153-166.
ZERFASS, A., Huck S. (2007). Innovation, communication, and leadership: new developments in strategic communication. International. Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 107-122.
ZERFASS, A. et al. (2013). European Communication Monitor 2013. A Changing Landscape – Managing Crises, Digital Communication and CEO Positioning in Europe. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).